1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | 5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |