1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP) has 371 more horse power than 1966 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Cortina. (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Cortina | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.7 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 72 L |