1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Cortina | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Cortina | XF |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2909 mm |
