1966 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Cortina | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Cortina | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 6290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1925 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 4180 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |