1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1959 Saab 750
To start off, 1966 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 750 would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 750, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Falcon | 1959 Saab 750 | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Falcon | 750 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2500 mm |
