1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1964 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1966 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 159 kg more than 1964 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 1964 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Falcon | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 42 L |