1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, both 1966 Ford Falcon and 1966 Renault 4 were released in the same year (1966). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 469 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | 4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 60 L |