1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1969 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 1969 Mazda 110 S is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 153 kg more than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Falcon (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Falcon | 1969 Mazda 110 S | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Falcon | 110 S |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2360 mm |
