1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1978 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1978 Renault Rodeo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 439 kg more than 1978 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 1978 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2410 mm |