1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1980 Volvo 265

To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 381 kg more than 1966 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Falcon (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Ford Falcon 1980 Volvo 265
Make Ford Volvo
Model Falcon 265
Year Released 1966 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2782 cc 2315 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.9 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.7 mm 86.4 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1119 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 L 58 L