1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 423 kg more than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Falcon | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Falcon | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 57 L |
