1966 Ford Falcon vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4690 mm |