1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 119 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Falcon | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Falcon | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 4996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2680 mm |
