1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 716 kg more than 1966 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Falcon | MM |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 106 L |