1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Kia Pregio
To start off, 2004 Kia Pregio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Kia Pregio. (93 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Pregio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Pregio weights approximately 561 kg more than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Pregio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 2004 Kia Pregio | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Falcon | Pregio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2590 mm |