1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 2006 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Falcon | Yukon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 509 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.7 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 98 L |