1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 2009 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Falcon | NP300 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 75 L |