1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Audi Q5
To start off, 2010 Audi Q5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi Q5 (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 2010 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi Q5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 2010 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Falcon | Q5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 75 L |