1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 847 kg more than 1966 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon. 2010 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Falcon | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 76 L |