1966 Ford Galaxie vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Galaxie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Galaxie would be higher. At 6,387 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Galaxie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Galaxie (236 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Galaxie should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Galaxie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Galaxie (406 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Galaxie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Galaxie | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | Galaxie | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6387 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 236 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 406 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
