1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1953 Renault Juva
To start off, 1966 Ford GT 40 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1953 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1953 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 326 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 1953 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | GT 40 | Juva |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2360 mm |
