1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1970 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (247 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 328 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (482 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1966 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 482 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1464 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2830 mm |