1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 982 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | GT 40 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 2118 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 107 L |
