1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1977 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1977 Nissan 240 C is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 124 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 1977 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | GT 40 | 240 C |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2700 mm |
