1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1982 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1982 Lancia Beta is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 76 kg more than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 1982 Lancia Beta | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | GT 40 | Beta |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 51 L |
