1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1983 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 269 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (121 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1983 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 121 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2530 mm |