1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 262 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 274 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Aerostar (160 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1986 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | GT 40 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 3030 mm |
