1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 1992 Rover 100 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Rover 100 (135 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1992 Rover 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 1992 Rover 100 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | GT 40 | 100 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1380 mm |