1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 (544 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1966 Ford GT 40. (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford GT 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 38 kg more than 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 552 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 544 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2730 mm |