1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero

To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero weights approximately 769 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (309 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1966 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: