1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Microbus
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Microbus is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Microbus. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Microbus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen Microbus weights approximately 524 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Microbus (200 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Microbus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 2000 Volkswagen Microbus | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | GT 40 | Microbus |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2470 mm |