1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2001 Toyota RSC. (194 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota RSC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota RSC weights approximately 260 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota RSC (284 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota RSC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | GT 40 | RSC |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1396 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2510 mm |
