1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 426 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | GT 40 | Minica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2350 mm |
