1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 369 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (192 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | GT 40 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2437 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1505 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 70 L |
