1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1138 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | GT 40 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 106 L |
