1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 494 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (151 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | GT 40 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 55 L |
