1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 241 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2490 mm |