1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 186 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Rustler (102 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda Rustler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | GT 40 | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1323 cc |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 54 L |
