1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 56 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | GT 40 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2550 mm |