1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook

To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2009 Saturn Outlook. (277 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Saturn Outlook.

Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1966 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: