1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Lexus RX. (295 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus RX weights approximately 914 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2010 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Ford | Lexus |
| Model | GT 40 | RX |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 73 L |
