1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 84 kg more than 2011 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | Note |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2600 mm |