1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2011 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2011 Renault Latitude is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 2011 Renault Latitude | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | GT 40 | Latitude |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4897 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1832 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2760 mm |