1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | GT 40 | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
