1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 204 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (155 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford GT 40 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | GT 40 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 47 L |
