1966 Ford Lotus Cortina vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina weights approximately 100 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Lotus Cortina | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Lotus Cortina | 92 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2480 mm |