1966 Ford Lotus Cortina vs. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina | 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Lotus Cortina | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 6229 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 109 L |
