1966 Ford Lotus Cortina vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina.
Because 2005 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Lotus Cortina | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Lotus Cortina | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2490 mm |