1966 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1967 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Mustang weights approximately 273 kg more than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Bluebird (103 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 1967 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Mustang | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6385 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 906 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2430 mm |
