1966 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Triumph 2000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 1972 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Mustang | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Mustang | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6385 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
